<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Defining Originality</title>
	<atom:link href="http://patjissi.net/defining-originality/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://patjissi.net/defining-originality/</link>
	<description>the ramblings of little miss patji</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 04:42:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Jenny</title>
		<link>http://patjissi.net/defining-originality/comment-page-1/#comment-15</link>
		<dc:creator>Jenny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jun 2010 16:03:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patjissi.net/?p=71#comment-15</guid>
		<description>There is no such thing as 100% original in my opinion, because everyone is getting inspirations from different things, so the end result is always a combination of influences from different sources. Like you said, it really comes down to how you execute it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is no such thing as 100% original in my opinion, because everyone is getting inspirations from different things, so the end result is always a combination of influences from different sources. Like you said, it really comes down to how you execute it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ongaku</title>
		<link>http://patjissi.net/defining-originality/comment-page-1/#comment-14</link>
		<dc:creator>Ongaku</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2010 21:37:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patjissi.net/?p=71#comment-14</guid>
		<description>I would have to agree that being original is completely over rated. It&#039;s all about how you can pull it off. XD

Still, sometimes it isn&#039;t just that and things get popular even though they suck. I have read a number of books that are only so-so but get a lot of media and popularity for it. No special writing talent or originality. I&#039;m trying to figure out why. LOL Stupid masses.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would have to agree that being original is completely over rated. It&#8217;s all about how you can pull it off. XD</p>
<p>Still, sometimes it isn&#8217;t just that and things get popular even though they suck. I have read a number of books that are only so-so but get a lot of media and popularity for it. No special writing talent or originality. I&#8217;m trying to figure out why. LOL Stupid masses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephanie</title>
		<link>http://patjissi.net/defining-originality/comment-page-1/#comment-13</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephanie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jun 2010 00:30:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patjissi.net/?p=71#comment-13</guid>
		<description>Sounds like a good plan to me. :) I don&#039;t think very much about originality so much as if it&#039;s a new spin on an old idea, or a different way to look at things. There are untold numbers of perspectives so we might as well tap into that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds like a good plan to me. <img src='http://patjissi.net/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  I don&#8217;t think very much about originality so much as if it&#8217;s a new spin on an old idea, or a different way to look at things. There are untold numbers of perspectives so we might as well tap into that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

